This blog is an attempt to expose the propaganda masquerading as political correctness which is epidemic in the news media. A news media which is following the model established by fascist, communist, and dictatorial regimes. Plus a few fun videos mixed in with some product reviews.
Also, exposing the hypocrisy of cult groups such as She Shepherd and their type .
On a wall next to gasoline pumps sits a fire extinguisher.To be used to snuff out a small fire reducing
the danger of an explosion.
Problem is the fire extinguisher is housed in a receptacle
requiring a key.Now how stupid is that?By the time the key is located while people
are panicking amid a fire, it will be too late.
Some years ago when the Communist government in China
started building up and modernizing their military their neighbors in Asia were
concerned.To alleviate the fears of
their neighbors the commies stated their military buildup was purely for peace.
The problem is China’s neighbors thought they meant “peace,”
when what they really meant was “piece.”A piece of the Philippines (Scarborough Shoal).A piece of Vietnam (territorial waters off
Vietnam).A piece of Japan (the Senkaku
Islands).A piece of India (invading the
border region between the two nations).
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea –
UNCLOS, allows for a twelve mile off shore territorial claim off natural shores
not artificial islands.
However the commies in China have a different interpretation
of reality.They are ignoring the EEZ’s
established by the United Nations and established their own zone claiming
virtually all of the South China Sea.They are blatantly violating the EEZ’s of Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Brunei, and the Philippines.With the Spratly Islands belonging to the Philippines, the commies are
claiming these islands also.
The government of the Philippines allowed China’s
aggressive, bully behavior because China’s military is too massive.The peaceful or piece-full commie military
with evil sinister designs on their neighbors.Remember, commies never make good neighbors.
By claiming twelve nautical miles off their artificial islands
China is violating the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.To maintain navigational freedom in
international waters and freedom of navigation the United States sent the
destroyer USS Lassen to sail within twelve miles of China’s artificial islands
built within stolen waters.
China bullying
China’s reaction was harsh words and no action.The U.S. Navy stood up to a bully and why did
the Philippines not join in?
When China first move aggressively against Philippine territory
the Philippines should have employed their navy.If the
commies would have fire upon the Philippine Navy it would have brought
world-wide condemnation and possibly an embargo.The reaction would have had a negative impact
upon their fragile economy resulting in a possible collapse of the commie
government.
Whatever the outcome it would have demonstrated the
Philippines will not be allowed to fall victim to bullies.
China’s interest in these islands has more to do with oil,
gas, and fishing than it does with national integrity.These are the conflicts of the 21st century
we can look forward to with the commies in China initiating and or instigating
conflicts.
During this political season this phenomenon will be common place.This has to do with when a person gives a speech
or talk in public usually behind the speaker are people standing or sitting.In the majority of cases this human backdrop
is intentional.
They can be labeled the “stand behind” or “sit behind.”What is their purpose?Do they enjoy looking at the back of the head
of the speaker?Are they being used as
props?
The headline on The Sydney Morning Herald’s website reads:
“Japan rejects international court jurisdiction over whaling”
The International Court of Justice ruled Japan whaling in
the Southern Ocean is illegal and now Japan rejects that illegal verdict.This caused his Excellency cosplay Paul
Watson to post on his Facelessbook page a scathing rebuke of the Japanese.
Cosplay Watson wrote: “Japan Arrogantly Spits in the Faces
of the Judges for the International Court of Justice”
Did not the criminal Watson spit in the face of the German
judge who released him from jail on bond?Then soon after cosplay Watson skipped bail and ran out of Germany.
Watson wrote: “If Japan kills another whale in the Southern
Ocean they will officially become pirate whalers, a rogue nation with
absolutely no respect for the rule of law, no respect for conservation and no
respect for science.”
Japan has no respect for the law?It was cosplay Watson himself who continually
boast about the whaling vessels he sunk while in port.His minions this past summer in the Faroe Islands
have been arrested for their no respect of the law.
Watson continues with: “Japan's position is that they will
do whatever they wish, whenever they wish, however they wish and the rest of
the world be damned.”
That is exactly how Sea Shepherd behaves in Japan, the Faroe
Islands and the Southern Ocean.Perhaps delusional
Watson believes only he and his cult group are permitted to “do whatever they
wish, whenever they wish, however they wish and the rest of the world be
damned.”
Bail-jumper Watson ended with: “An international policing
effort must take action to prevent Japan's on-going crimes in the Southern
Ocean.”
Why an “international policing effort,” when the cult group
has been given a number of ocean going vessels to interfere with the Japanese
in the Southern Ocean?Seems like come
this whaling season Watson plans to exempt Sea Shepherd from interfering with
the Japanese whalers.Why?Is he a coward?
Japan has reinterpreted Article 9 of their constitution allowing
them to take a more active military role in protecting Japan and their business
interest.The cowards are fearing an interdiction
in the Southern Ocean by the Japanese military.That is why Watson wrote calling for “an international policing effort.”
How do you spell “coward?”Here is how “ w a t s o n.”
Link to article concerning Japan’s rejection of the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) judgement:
