Texas state district Judge Deborah Oakes Evens issued a “gag”
order on the press. It was in reference
to the trial of William Hudson who is facing murder charges. The judge ordered the press not to report on
the proceedings involving the evidence permitted at the trail.
When this order was issued the American news media started
caterwauling like a stuff pig. They
demanded the judge maintain fidelity to the First Amendment to the United
States Constitution guaranteeing freedom of the press. They claim there should be no restriction on
the Constitution protected right of a free press.
This is the very same press that supports and demands restrictions
be placed on other rights protected by that same Amendment. Those would be:
-
Freedom of Religion: The press supports eradicating religion from
the public square. To the press the First
Amendment does not mean freedom of religion, but freedom from religion.
-
Free Speech:
Yet it is the press promoting the criminalization of what they interpret
as being hate speech.
-
Peaceably assemble: The news media urged and supported the
Clintonista law prohibiting “peaceably to assemble” in front of abortion
clinics.
Yep the press demands fidelity to the First Amendment, only
the part that applies to them, the rest they demand restriction. “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder” title of a
book by Doctor Michael Savage.
Subsequently the judge lifted her gag order on the press.
The right of a “Free Press” as housed in the First Amendment
reads as follows:
“Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
There are five enumerated rights in the above amendment,
however one out of the four is perceived to be without limits. While at the same time the other three must
be limited. Further proof of the
hypocrisy of the bias news media and American liberals.
The “free press” portion was envisioned by the Founders to
mean the government would not prohibit the press or demand of the press. However the press was to be subject to the
same laws as enjoyed by the rest of the populace.
If a citizen knowingly accepts stolen property that is a
crime. If a member of the press receives
stolen material for publication that according to the news media is
protected.
The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms and we
all know how that has been butchered by the same gang demanding no restrictions
on a “free press.”
Editorial referenced in this video:
Link to Texas Daddy store:
