Thursday, January 22, 2015

Obama compared to Hitler?




Obama compared to Hitler?

A Republican from Texas a member of the United States House of Representatives recently issued the following Tweet:

“Even Adolph Hitler thought it more important than Obama to get to Paris. 
(For all the wrong reasons.)  Obama couldn’t do it for the right reasons.”

Democrats, liberals, and the news media all accused Representative Weber of comparing President Obama to Hitler.  These false accusations caused Mr. Weber to issue an apology.  Really?

There was no comparison in that Tweet.  Had the Representative written something like this: “Since Obama is like Hitler, he too should have went to Paris as Hitler did.”  That is a comparison and that is NOT what was Tweeted.  It is just another excuse for Democrats, liberals, and the news media to falsely vilify a Republican. 

Where was this outrage during the eight years when President Bush was in office and constantly compared to Hitler?      

Articles about Representative Randy Weber’s Tweet:


Divine Right of Kings:

Comparing President Bush to Hitler:


Link to Texas Daddy store:

South Korean Japanese justice


South Korean Japanese justice

Mr. Tatsuya Kato, a Japanese journalist who works for the Japanese newspaper Sankei Shimbun, was ordered by South Korean authorities not to leave South Korea.  Mr. Kato is charged with defaming South Korea’s President Park Geun-hey.  Resulting in being charged with criminal defamation.

Mr. Kato’s offense was he re-reported an article that appeared in the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo.  The article made reference to President Park Geun-hey being with a male admirer at the time the Sewol ferry sank killing more than 300 passengers, most were school children. 

Freedom of the press?  How come the original source for the article the Chosun Ilbo was not charged?  Article 21 of the South Korean Constitution reads:

(1)    “All citizens shall enjoy freedom of speech and the press, and freedom of assembly and association.”

Seems like South Korea does enjoy freedom of the press according to their Constitution.  No so fat, there is a qualifier, and that qualifier is the part the reads “All citizens.”  Mr. Kato is not a South Korean citizen as he is a Japanese citizen.  Reading Article 21, clause 1, of the South Korean Constitution it is easy to read where freedom of the press is only to be enjoyed by South Korean citizens. 

Further on in Article 21, clause 4 it reads:

(4) “Neither speech nor the press shall violate the honor or rights of other persons nor undermine public morals or social ethics.  Should speech or the press violate the honor or rights of other persons, claims may be made for the damage resulting there from.”

Here it basically reads anyone one who insults the honor of a person, charges can result.  It seems with this clause the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo would face the same charges as Tatsuya Kato.  Are there two forms of justice in South Korea?  Are foreign journalists at risk in South Korea?

Related articles:






South Korean Constitution, please read Article 21 (pdf file):

Dr. Robert J. Shapiro discussing this issue in the below video link:

Link to Texas Daddy store:

Agree with criminal Watson?



Agree with criminal Watson?

Three toothfish poaching vessels have come to the attention of the New Zealand Navy.  In an effort to interdict and/or confiscate these vessels, the New Zealand Navy sent their patrol vessel the HMNZS Wellington to halt the poaching activities of these three vessels. 

The HMNZS Wellington arrived on the scene to photograph, video, and watch the poaching activities of the two poaching vessels:  Songhua and Kunlun.  The HMNZS Wellington returned to port allowing the three poaching vessels to continue their poaching.    The commander of the New Zealand Navy vessel said the waters were too rough to engage in a safe boarding. 

Photographs of the incident were released by the New Zealand Navy.  One photograph illustrates what might be considered rough seas.  However another photograph with the HMNZS Wellington and a poaching vessel clearly show a calm sea.  The sea is so calm it looks like the two vessels are resting on top of glass.

Subsequently Sea Shepherd’s criminal Watson post criticism of the New Zealand Navy on his Facelessbook page.  Could criminal Watson be correct in his criticism?  Who is correct here, the Wellington or the Watson?   

Criminal Watson’s Facelessbook criticism of the New Zealand Navy:
Criminal Watson

Article referenced in this video:

Related articles:


Link to video mentioned concerning agreeing with the Communist in China:

Here is a link to Sea Shepherd’s website where you can donate money:

Link to Texas Daddy store:


Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Save the Dolphins abuse


Save the Dolphins abuse

Here are comments left by the save the dolphin clowns on Japan’s Prime Minister’s Facebook page in reference to the two Japanese being held by terrorists:
Click on above to enlarge.  More hate by those who hate

Save the dolphins abuse

(you can read it on the PM’s page under the title “Message from Japan regarding the incident on warning of Japanese nationals’ execution"):
 
Link to Prime Minister’s Facebook page:

Monday, January 19, 2015

Sea Shepherd Cove Cowards will not stop

Sea Shepherd Cove Cowards will not stop

The Cove Cowards in Taiji on their Facelessbook page have a photograph of four clowns standing at the water’s edge holding up signs as illustrated below.  How many dolphins did those four save?  The amusing aspect is their minions credit them for being so brave.  Yep, it sure takes courage to stand at the water’s edge in a passive nation is self-righteous indignation.
They will not stop?  Nor, will their critics...............


Sea Shepherd Cove Guardians Taiji Japan artist rendering

The actual clown photograph