Reproductive Rights vs. Contraceptive Rights?
Nationally known Sandra Fluke a “reproductive rights
activist” as described by The Dallas Morning News recently spoke at Southern
Methodist University – SMU.
Reporting on Miss Fluke’s address at SMU, the DMN (The
Dallas Morning News) wrote women need access to contraception. Question: who was or is denying women to
purchase contraceptives? Reading further
into the article is seems Miss Fluke would like to see either the government or
insurance companies pay for contraceptives.
First: Why should tax
payers pay for women’s contraceptives?
Should not the women engaging in sexual activity be responsible for the
contraceptives or her sexual partner?
Second: Contraceptives
stop reproduction. So how can Miss Fluke
be labeled a reproductive activists when she advocates free contraceptives that
will stop reproduction?
Third: The article mentions
Miss Fluke supports birth control to help prevent “unintended
pregnancies.” Hello, would not having
sex prevent “unintended pregnancies” without any cost to the tax payer or
insurance companies?
The Dallas Morning News article:
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/park-cities/headlines/20120924-womens-health-activist-sandra-fluke-touts-importance-of-birth-control-at-smu-forum.ece
Video of Sandra Fluke at the Democratic National Convention:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfNimwxSTU4
Link to Texas Daddy store:
http://texas-daddy.shop-pro.jp/
No comments:
Post a Comment