Agree with criminal Watson?
Three toothfish poaching vessels have come to the attention
of the New Zealand Navy. In an effort to
interdict and/or confiscate these vessels, the New Zealand Navy sent their
patrol vessel the HMNZS Wellington to halt the poaching activities of these
three vessels.
The HMNZS Wellington arrived on the scene to photograph,
video, and watch the poaching activities of the two poaching vessels: Songhua and Kunlun. The HMNZS Wellington returned to port
allowing the three poaching vessels to continue their poaching. The commander of the New Zealand Navy
vessel said the waters were too rough to engage in a safe boarding.
Photographs of the incident were released by the New Zealand
Navy. One photograph illustrates what
might be considered rough seas. However
another photograph with the HMNZS Wellington and a poaching vessel clearly show
a calm sea. The sea is so calm it looks
like the two vessels are resting on top of glass.
Subsequently Sea Shepherd’s criminal Watson post criticism
of the New Zealand Navy on his Facelessbook page. Could criminal Watson be correct in his
criticism? Who is correct here, the
Wellington or the Watson?
Criminal Watson’s Facelessbook criticism of the New Zealand
Navy:
 |
| Criminal Watson |
Article referenced in this video:
Related articles:
Link to video mentioned concerning agreeing with the
Communist in China:
Here is a link to Sea Shepherd’s website where you can donate
money:
Link to Texas Daddy store:
No comments:
Post a Comment