Non-Human Person
Lunatic liberals in the USA have so far been unsuccessful in
their attempts to have human rights afforded to members of the primate family,
specifically to orangutans / apes.
Perhaps these clowns (the humans, not the apes) should look to their
counter-parts south in Argentina, South America.
A court in Buenos Aires ruled an orangutan to be a
“non-human person.” Did it take a court
to notice the obvious? According to
liberals any creature with a heart-beat is a “person.” So far it is acceptable to classify
orangutans as being non-human. Labeling
an orangutan as a “non-human person” is only stating the obvious.
This ruling will place the orangutan from its current
confinement to a sanctuary. Placing the
non-person human in a sanctuary still relegates it to confinement, although
larger than the current confinement, none-the-less still being held
captive.
The lawyer involved in the Argentina case is quoted as
stating in the Malaysian and Indonesian languages the word “orangutan” means
“forest man.” The inference being “man”
in the interpretation implies validation to the non-human person
classification.
With that lack of logic how about awarding non-human person status
to the “man” in the moon? Then there is
the snowMAN who would enjoy this enhanced classification.
Criminal Watson noted on his Facelessbook page the ruling and
contemplated such classifications be awarded to primates, dolphins, whales, and
elephants. Imagine going to work one
morning and having an orangutan sitting next to you on the subway hurling it’s
poop at other commuters. The new world
order brought to you by lunatic liberals and one criminal.
Link to criminal Watson’s Facelessbook (Facebook) page; see
comment dated 12 /22 / 2014 4:29 PM:
 |
| Non-human person |
Related articles:
Link to Texas Daddy store:
 |
| Subway car with non-human person |
No comments:
Post a Comment